Erasmus Institute

OUR PURPOSE
  Mission Statement

RESIDENTIAL FELLOWSHIPS
  Postdoctoral fellowships
  Application materials

FELLOWS & RESEARCH
  Current Fellows
     & their projects

  Past Fellows

SUMMER PROGRAMS
  Undergraduate seminars
  Application materials

EVENTS
  Current
  Past

PUBLICATIONS
  Books
  Occasional Papers
  Newsletters

NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

CONTACT US

 

FELLOWS & RESEARCH

Dissertation Fellow 2004-05

Michael Tomko
University of Notre Dame

The Catholic Question in British Romantic Literature: National Identity, History, and Religious Politics, 1791-1829

My dissertation argues that literary and historiographic interventions in the political campaign to extend civil rights to British Catholics (often known as the “Catholic Question” or Catholic emancipation) fundamentally transformed how Britain and its empire incorporated but also regulated religious minorities. My project intersects with studies of the romantic period that emphasize the role of anti-Catholicism in the construction of “Britishness,”
a sense of national identity that united Britain’s domestic regions and its foreign empire. Recent critics have examined the struggles over this emerging national ethos among writers from Scotland and Ireland, nations often viewed as colonies within Britain. Figures ranging from Edmund Burke to Samuel Taylor Coleridge, however, also labeled British Catholics a dangerous “imperium in imperio,” or “nation within the nation.” Examining the intersection of religious politics and internal colonialism, I argue that the prospective “return” of British Catholicism and its “recusant” understanding of national history troubled both Catholic emancipation’s conservative opponents, such as William Wordsworth, and its radical proponents, such as Percy Bysshe Shelley. Even though a form of legal religious tolerance foundational to the modern liberal state emerged in the 1829 Catholic Emancipation Act, romantic period literature—especially in its narration of history—helped to establish unofficial cultural limits of citizenship and exerted a subtler, but no less powerful, pressure on religious minorities to conform to “Britishness” and modernity.

My project draws on postcolonial theory and criticism to explore the anxieties over the nation-building project in the historical novels of Walter Scott, the topographic poetry of Wordsworth, and the visionary poetry of Shelley. Methodologically, I seek to expand ongoing reassessments of romantic “religious politics” to consider how genre, poetic form, and narrative structure register and redirect political and cultural transformations. In its dialogue between British romanticism and English Catholic cultural history, my work also examines the ambiguities surrounding history, religion, and nation in Catholic writers and historians often overshadowed by the later Victorian “Catholic revival.” Elizabeth Inchbald, for example, wrote A Simple Story, arguably the first Catholic novel in English, concurrent with the French Revolution and the first Catholic Relief Acts. By exploring such foundational negotiations of national and religious identity, my project extends the work of postcolonial historians who argue that romanticism’s progressive or “stadial” models of history still distort contemporary struggles over religious difference and who attempt to recover alternative voices on religious minorities and nationality from the past.

University of Notre Dame