Erasmus Institute

OUR PURPOSE
  Mission Statement

RESIDENTIAL FELLOWSHIPS
  Postdoctoral fellowships
  Application materials

FELLOWS & RESEARCH
  Current Fellows
     & their projects

  Past Fellows

SUMMER PROGRAMS
  Undergraduate seminars
  Application materials

EVENTS
  Current
  Past

PUBLICATIONS
  Books
  Occasional Papers
  Newsletters

NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

CONTACT US

 

FELLOWS & RESEARCH

Dissertation Fellow 2004-05

Eleonora Bonocuore (Spring 2005)
Università degli Studi di Siena

In Search of the Middle Term: Pseudo-Lullian Logic and the Work of Bernhard of Lavinheta as a Link between Ramon Lull’s Thought and Renaissance Lullism in Europe

The development of Lullism in the Middle Ages and Renaissance has been considered by philosophical historiography in the pioneering works of Catalan scholars, Carreras y Artau and Batllori, and, subsequently, in the research of Yates, Hillgarth, Platzeck and Bonner; in Italy these studies were pursued by Rossi, Zambelli and Pereira. What makes this topic so rich is the possibility of exploring how, during the 15th century through the work of the so-called “minor” thinkers, there emerged a new, revolutionary reading of Lullian thought. This shift in understanding reality and in the thought-structures used to perceive the world occurred first in the small circle of Lullists, and then through them, in other influential European intellectual environments (e.g., Lefèvre and his followers in Paris and the circle of St. Justina in Padua), resulting in a reinterpretation of Lullism both as a mnemonic technique (Agrippa, Bruno) and as an encyclopaedia of knowledge (Alsted). Within this shift, the works of Bernhard of Lavinheta, though generally ignored, are central because they contain elements of both the medieval and Renaissance Lullisms, thus allowing us to glimpse how and why these developments occurred.

My dissertation first reconstructs the beginning of a Lullian tradition in 14th-century Europe (Catalunya, Italy, France) and proceeds in the second and third chapters to a study of two almost unknown texts (editions of each are offered in the Appendix). The first of these, entitled Loyca discipuli magistri Raymundi Lulli, provides an introduction to logic that is striking because it combines various crucial Lullian features with a classical Scholastic outline of the main logical problems and with the new Ockamistic trends. The second text, called Novem Introductiones, is an earlier treatise of Lullian logic of Italian origin, probably to be identified with the pseudo-Lullian Logica Parva; these two Italian texts provide evidence for the existence and the importance of two Lullian centres of study in Italy, at Genoa and at Venice, in the early 15th century. The remaining chapters study the Franciscan friar Bernhard of Lavinheta, who occupied the first official chair of Lullism at the Sorbonne in 1515. They focus on his Explanatio compendiosaque applicatio artis Raymundi Lulli (1523), examining the origins of the author’s thought and the texts which influenced it. To such an end, it will be necessary to study the convergence within the studia Franciscana between Lullism, Scotism and Ockhamism, as is suggested by Lavinheta’s own intellectual formation, largely influenced by the philosophic tradition of Duns Scotus.

University of Notre Dame