Erasmus Institute

OUR PURPOSE
  Mission Statement

RESIDENTIAL FELLOWSHIPS
  Postdoctoral fellowships
  Application materials

FELLOWS & RESEARCH
  Current Fellows
     & their projects

  Past Fellows

SUMMER PROGRAMS
  Undergraduate seminars
  Application materials

EVENTS
  Current
  Past

PUBLICATIONS
  Books
  Occasional Papers
  Newsletters

NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

CONTACT US

 

FELLOWS & RESEARCH

Dissertation Fellow 2003-04

Bradford Whitener (History)
University of Virginia

Varieties of Historical Consciousness in Modern Germany:
Ranke, Döllinger, and Marx

This dissertation project is an investigation into how modern conceptions of history developed in the nineteenth century. I focus on three thinkers, the canonical founder of professional historiography Leopold von Ranke, the important Catholic Church historian Ignaz von Döllinger, and Karl Marx. I find a correlation between their conceptions of history and two underlying ontologies: a naturalist conception finding an eternal, ordered, rational substrate in the world, and a voluntarist conception taking everything back to a creating will. I find that the modern conceptions of history reflected in the writings of these three thinkers all draw on the logics implicit in these two ontologies.

My investigation of Ranke shows how his attempt to maintain both ontologies simultaneously engendered contradictions that he could not resolve. In short, he wanted to maintain a version of humanism, which emphasized man, while at the same time he sought to articulate the underlying meaning of history, which emphasized God's purpose for man. I find Döllinger's conception of history to be more consistently dependent on the voluntarist ontology. While many of Döllinger's critics have sought to connect his "Liberal Catholicism" to Protestant influences, I find the more plausible connection to be Döllinger's dependence on the voluntarist ontology implicit in Catholic theological traditions. Marx's conception of history is a creative blending of both naturalist and voluntarist ontologies, now advanced within the context of purely secular conceptions of progress and liberation. In short, Marx's confidence in a rational process in history stems from the naturalist ontology; his confidence that history's development is progressive stems from the voluntarist ontology.

While each thinker's conception of history draws on these naturalist and voluntarist ontologies in different ways, collectively they help us to understand the broader movement toward secular thinking occurring in the nineteenth century. My research attempts to understand how these deep-rooted ontological assumptions shape and limit historical conceptualization in the modern world.

University of Notre Dame