Erasmus Institute

OUR PURPOSE
  Mission Statement

RESIDENTIAL FELLOWSHIPS
  Postdoctoral fellowships
  Application materials

FELLOWS & RESEARCH
  Current Fellows
     & their projects

  Past Fellows

SUMMER PROGRAMS
  Undergraduate seminars
  Application materials

EVENTS
  Current
  Past

PUBLICATIONS
  Books
  Occasional Papers
  Newsletters

NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

CONTACT US

 

FELLOWS & RESEARCH

Dissertation Fellow 2002-03

Elöd Nemerkenyi (Medieval Studies)
Central European University (Budapest)

Latin Classics in Medieval Hungary: The Eleventh Century

My major fields of interest comprise the academic disciplines of Classics and Medieval Studies—I specialize in medieval Latin and the classical tradition in the Middle Ages. The classical Latin background is absolutely necessary to my general research interest: medieval Latin as a linguistic tool to examine the interchange of the Christian intellectual tradition and the classical tradition in the Middle Ages. My doctoral dissertation research project, “Latin Classics in Medieval Hungary: The Eleventh Century,” focuses on four primary sources: the first source is a letter of Bishop Fulbert of Chartres to Bishop Bonipert of Pecs in Hungary, informing him that he is going to send a copy of Priscian’s Latin grammar to Pecs; the second source is the Admonitions attributed to King Saint Stephen of Hungary, a king’s mirror with numerous references to the Bible, the patristic authors, and the Latin classics; the third source is the Deliberatio of Bishop Saint Gerard of Csanad, an exegetical treatise embedded in the patristic tradition—with references to the seven liberal arts and the ancient Greek and Latin authors; the fourth source is the late eleventh-century book list of the Benedictine monastery of Pannonhalma, with mainly liturgical and patristic manuscripts and such classical entries as Cicero, Lucan, Donatus, and the Disticha Catonis.

It is important to work out a proper theoretical framework and view my preliminary results against the background of recent scholarship in classics and medieval studies in general and in medieval Latin philology in particular. I should also emphasize that the sparse evidence available for the eleventh century raises complex problems that are to be solved in their complexity—this is one of the reasons the four sources belong together. Drawing on this evidence, I intend to explain the impact of the imported high culture upon the receiving territory and to point out what makes the use of the mainstream Latin classics distinctive in their new context within a recently Christianized country. Finally, I expect to show that viewing the particular results in a wider context may be interesting not only for Hungarian scholarship but also for a broader international audience with an interest in medieval Christian humanism—classicists and medievalists alike.

University of Notre Dame