Erasmus Institute

OUR PURPOSE
  Mission Statement

RESIDENTIAL FELLOWSHIPS
  Postdoctoral fellowships
  Application materials

FELLOWS & RESEARCH
  Current Fellows
     & their projects

  Past Fellows

SUMMER PROGRAMS
  Undergraduate seminars
  Application materials

EVENTS
  Current
  Past

PUBLICATIONS
  Books
  Occasional Papers
  Newsletters

NEWS & ANNOUNCEMENTS

CONTACT US

 

FELLOWS & RESEARCH

Carey Senior Faculty Fellow 2001-02

Karl Morrison (History)
Rutgers University

Know Thyself: Christian Art and Spirituality in the West

The axiom, "know thyself," was part of the classical tradition that had an immense impact, and a still continuing incarnation, in Christianity. My research began as an archeological project. I intended to dig exploratory trenches at critical moments in the history of Western Civilization to see how people made sense of those two words, "Know thyself." Clearly, some of the possible Christian senses would be radically different from pagan antecedents, so different as to make self-knowing a completely different project from any conceivable in Antiquity. I planned to use this exploration as a test of the difference Christianity made in the understanding of human nature.

I soon realized that the venture of self-knowing required tools, tools of analysis, reflection, controversy. From the beginning of the venture, probably in archaic Greece, people who practiced it capitalized on the fact that we can't see our own faces. To know what we look like--what we are, at least in our individuating faces--we have to look into some reflective medium, a mirror, for example, or the reactions of other people, their facial expressions and gestures, or drama. Hamlet was saying nothing new when he proposed to "catch the conscience of the King" in his little play. This is how I decided to explore Christian religious art as a medium of self-knowing.

Christian art had a beginning, around 200 C.E. I am prepared to argue that, as a devotional medium for the community, it also had an end, sometime during the turn from Baroque to Roccoco. Naturally, ecclesiastical art has continued, but I think that devotional art survives in countless personal turns, and especially in what is derided as Kitsch. When the Council of Trent turned aside from the novel and the unfamiliar, it cut institutional religion off from the development of art as a field of exploration. The results have been lamented and struggled against by many movements aiming to revive Christian art from the nineteenth century to the present.

To sum up: My project is to explore the career of Christian art as a tool of self-knowing, and to consider some reasons for its appearance, late in the history of the primitive Church, and for its disappearance in the age of Descartes. From the beginning, of course, self-knowing was one of a two-pronged venture. The other prong was knowing God. One reason for the appearance I mentioned may well be that anthropology was accepted (up to a point) as casting some light on theology. One reason for the disappearance may well be that points of intersection earlier alleged between anthropology and theology were discredited.

University of Notre Dame