Notre Dame Topology Seminar



Fall 2008 Schedule




 

Date

Time and location

Speaker/Affiliation

Title

October 2

pretalk 10-11 AM, talk 12-1 PM
258 Hurley

Tom Fiore, University of Chicago

A Thomason Model Structure on nFoldCat

October 9

10-11 AM
258 Hurley

Stacy Hoehn

Parametrized Wall Finiteness and Siebenmann End Obstructions

October 16

10-11 AM
258 Hurley

Stacy Hoehn

Constructing Family Versions of Geometric Invariants

November 25

10-11AM
125 Hayes-Healy

Sunil Chebolu

Some applications of the Bloch-Kato conjecture






 

Fall 2008 Abstracts

 
 

October 2, 2008: Tom Fiore

A Thomason Model Structure on nFoldCat

When are two categories the same? One possible notion of weak equivalence is an equivalence of categories, another is a functor whose nerve is a weak homotopy equivalence of simplicial sets. As is well known, these distinct notions of weak equivalence between categories have been encoded in model structures by Joyal-Tierney and Thomason. One can ask the same question for Ehresmann's internal categories in Cat: when are two double categories the same? Or, more generally, when are two n-fold categories the same? There are several reasonable notions of weak equivalence. One uses the nerve: an n-fold functor is a weak equivalence if and only if the diagonal of its nerve is a weak equivalence of simplicial sets. Our Theorem states that such n-fold functors form the weak equivalences of a model structure on nFoldCat, and that this model structure is Quillen equivalent to the standard structure on simplicial sets.

There are several reasons for interest in this topic. A double category is good context in which to embed two types of morphisms: ring homomorphisms and bimodules form the morphisms of a double category, as do cobordisms and diffeomorphisms. A double category is also a good place to treat base change. The Thomason model structure is of interest because of Quillen's Theorems A and B, as well as Thomason's result on certain nerves of categories as models for certain homotopy colimits.

This is joint work with Simona Paoli.

October 9, 2008: Stacy Hoehn

Parametrized Wall Finiteness and Siebenmann End Obstructions

Given a finitely dominated space X, the classical finiteness obstruction of Wall is an element in a certain group that vanishes if and only if X is homotopy equivalent to a finite CW complex. Similarly, given a non-compact manifold M that satisfies certain tameness properties near its ends, the classical end obstruction of Siebenmann is an element in a certain group that vanishes if and only if M can be completed to a compact manifold with boundary. Both of these classical obstructions can be parametrized to answer questions about families of spaces. We will discuss both of these parametrized obstructions and describe their relationships with one another.

October 16, 2008: Stacy Hoehn

Constructing Family Versions of Geometric Invariants


Many classical geometric invariants, like Wall's finiteness obstruction and the symmetric signature of certain spaces, have parametrized versions that can be used to answer questions about families of spaces. In the naive approach to constructing these family versions, problems may arise in guaranteeing compatibility among the different spaces in the family. We will describe how these problems can be avoided in certain situations by working on the level of categories instead of topological spaces.

November 25, 2008: Sunil Chebolu

Some applications of the Bloch-Kato conjecture


The Bloch-Kato conjecture claims that the reduced Milnor K-theory of a field F is isomorphic to the Galois cohomology of F. (I will explain these terms and the conjecture in detail in my talk.) This conjecture has been recently settled by Voevodsky and Rost. I will present some applications of this conjecture. In particular, I will show how this conjecture allows us to detect absolute Galois groups, and give cohomological characterisations of quadratic closures. This is joint work with Jan Minac.




2007-2008 Topology Seminar

Graduate Topology/Geometry Seminar

Notre Dame Department of Mathematics



Questions? Contact Kate Ponto